Are Spinal X-Rays Safe? 7 Evidence-Based Reasons Not to Fear Them
What the Study Asked
The authors asked: “Are low-dose spinal X-rays (radiographs) genuinely risky for patients undergoing postural/spinal rehabilitation, or are fears exaggerated?”
What They Did
They reviewed the scientific evidence regarding the dose of radiation from typical spinal X-rays and compared it to natural background exposure.
They analysed the historical basis of the linear-no-threshold (LNT) model (the idea that any radiation dose carries risk) and whether it applies at the low levels used in diagnostic imaging.
They presented seven key reasons why radiography in spinal/postural rehabilitation should not be feared or avoided.
What They Found
The LNT model (that every dose of radiation increases cancer risk linearly) is not strongly supported for very low-dose exposures like standard X-rays.
Radiographic doses are extremely low: in many cases well below natural background radiation levels.
Some evidence suggests low-dose radiation may even trigger adaptive repair responses (a concept called “hormesis”).
The fear of X-rays (radiophobia) is largely based on outdated or mis-applied models rather than current data.
When used appropriately in spinal/postural rehab, radiography can improve diagnosis, guide care and avoid guesswork, thus improving outcomes.
Why This Matters
If you worry about “getting X-rays every few visits” in a corrective chiropractic or postural program, this paper gives reassurance: the radiation dose is minimal, the risk is extremely low, and the potential benefit (accurate structural assessment) can be significant.
Citation
Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Radiophobia: 7 Reasons Why Radiography Used in Spine and Posture Rehabilitation Should Not Be Feared or Avoided. Dose Response. 2018;16(2):1559325818781445. doi:10.1177/1559325818781445